Article 1: http://www.newsdaily.com/article/a21b2af3c818a2b5195cc745f85080f1/mexico-captures-top-drug-kingpin-el-chapo-guzman
Article 2: http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/22/world/americas/mexico-cartel-chief-arrest/
Article 3: http://www.newser.com/article/7bcba1cc3daf482fb4d91dc2822924e5/us-mexican-officials-arrest-sinaloa-cartel-chief-chapo-guzman-show-him-to-public.html

BREAKING NEWS!!!! Guzman known as "El Chapo" the Mexican drug cartel chief has been captured after years on run.

Article 1,2 and 3 are all talking about Guzman's arrest,they are all talking about how he was on the run for many years and how with the help of the US drug enforcement ,the Mexican forces lead the operation.
In article 2,CNN with the help of a news gives information about the arrest and "El Chapo" history since he became public enemy number one. its very practical for people who don't like to read they can just watch the video and get the same information as the person who read the whole text,however the text on article 2 is very long and boring,differently from article 1,it ,it has a very brief text that contains all the information enough for a person to understand and picture the situation very clearly even though it doesn't have  a video to support its text as article 2 does.
Article 1 isn't really an article I would recommend to a person to read or use,it doesn't give out any information that can help you understand what happened and why it happened,it is the kind of article that sharpens someone's curiosity and makes you double your work by looking for another source of information because of its emptiness

If I had to choose to choose which article to use for any research,it would be the article 1,because its precision,they didn't go off track,and they gave the information necessary to understand the situation and why its a breaking news.